Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 07:04

Sending ATACMS is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Chiefs trivia: Your in-5 daily game, Friday edition - Arrowhead Pride
Russia can stop this any time.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Pure Orwell: Europe condemns Iran for attacks on its own territory - Responsible Statecraft
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Thank you.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump airs frustrations with Xi and Jerome Powell over elusive economic goals - NBC News
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
How can people balance religious beliefs with seeking professional mental health care?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Beef cattle disease found in southeast Iowa herd, first time seen in state - weareiowa.com
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
How many girls or guys keep extra pantyhose in their glove box or console of their vehicle?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.